1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2004 Scion xB
To start off, 2004 Scion xB is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Scion xB (108 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Scion xB should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Scion xB. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Scion xB. (142 Nm). This means 1950 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Jeep CJ3A | 2004 Scion xB | |
| Make | Jeep | Scion |
| Model | CJ3A | xB |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |
