1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2006 Peugeot 206
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 206 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 45 kg more than 2006 Peugeot 206.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Peugeot 206. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Peugeot 206. (94 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1950 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Peugeot 206.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jeep CJ3A | 2006 Peugeot 206 | |
Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
Model | CJ3A | 206 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2450 mm |