1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 145 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jeep CJ3A | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ3A | 6 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |