1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (174 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 490 kg more than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (232 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jeep CJ3A | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Jeep | Chevrolet |
Model | CJ3A | Orlando |
Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2760 mm |