1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (230 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jeep CJ3A | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Jeep | Chevrolet |
Model | CJ3A | Captiva |
Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 230 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2707 mm |