1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 811 kg more than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1950 Jeep CJ3A has manual transmission. 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Jeep CJ3A | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Jeep | Volvo |
| Model | CJ3A | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1921 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2748 mm |
