1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2013 Audi A6
To start off, 2013 Audi A6 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A6 (208 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Audi A6 weights approximately 564 kg more than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Audi A6 (350 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jeep CJ3A | 2013 Audi A6 | |
Make | Jeep | Audi |
Model | CJ3A | A6 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 208 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1674 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4925 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 2086 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1468 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2912 mm |