1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 155 kg more than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Cooper. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Cooper (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Jeep CJ3A | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Jeep | Mini |
Model | CJ3A | Cooper |
Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2547 mm |