1950 Maserati 4CLT vs. 1988 Volvo 760
To start off, 1988 Volvo 760 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 4CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 4CLT would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Volvo 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 4CLT (276 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1988 Volvo 760. (165 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 4CLT should accelerate faster than 1988 Volvo 760. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Volvo 760 weights approximately 715 kg more than 1950 Maserati 4CLT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1988 Volvo 760 has automatic transmission and 1950 Maserati 4CLT has manual transmission. 1950 Maserati 4CLT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1988 Volvo 760 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Maserati 4CLT | 1988 Volvo 760 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | 4CLT | 760 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2849 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1335 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2780 mm |
