1950 Maserati 4CLT vs. 1989 Mazda 626
To start off, 1989 Mazda 626 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 4CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 4CLT would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 4CLT (276 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 4CLT should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Mazda 626 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1950 Maserati 4CLT.
Because 1950 Maserati 4CLT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati 4CLT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Maserati 4CLT | 1989 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Maserati | Mazda |
| Model | 4CLT | 626 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1120 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2580 mm |
