1950 Maserati 4CLT vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 4CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 4CLT would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Maserati 4CLT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 4CLT (276 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (79 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 4CLT should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 250 kg more than 1950 Maserati 4CLT.
Because 1950 Maserati 4CLT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati 4CLT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Maserati 4CLT | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Maserati | Renault |
Model | 4CLT | Clio |
Year Released | 1950 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 870 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2480 mm |