1950 Maserati 4CLT vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 4CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 4CLT would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (511 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1950 Maserati 4CLT. (276 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati 4CLT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1950 Maserati 4CLT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Maserati 4CLT | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Maserati | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 4CLT | E |
Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 511 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2874 mm |