1950 Maserati 8CLT vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 8CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 8CLT would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 8CLT (424 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2011 Volvo XC60. (300 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 8CLT should accelerate faster than 2011 Volvo XC60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1121 kg more than 1950 Maserati 8CLT.
Because 2011 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Maserati 8CLT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1950 Maserati 8CLT has manual transmission. 1950 Maserati 8CLT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Maserati 8CLT | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | 8CLT | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 2980 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 424 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1921 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2748 mm |
