1950 Maserati A6G vs. 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho
To start off, 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,488 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho (78 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1950 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho weights approximately 256 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Maserati A6G | 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho | |
Make | Maserati | Matra-Simca |
Model | A6G | Rancho |
Year Released | 1950 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 876 kg | 1132 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2530 mm |