1950 Maserati A6G vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (174 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1950 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 844 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 1950 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1950 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Maserati A6G | 2003 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Maserati | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A6G | E |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 876 kg | 1720 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2860 mm |