1950 Maserati A6G vs. 2003 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2003 Smart Roadster is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,488 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Smart Roadster (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1950 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Smart Roadster should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Smart Roadster weights approximately 9 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Maserati A6G | 2003 Smart Roadster | |
| Make | Maserati | Smart |
| Model | A6G | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 876 kg | 885 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2370 mm |
