1950 Maserati A6G vs. 2005 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1950 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S60 weights approximately 661 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Maserati A6G | 2005 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | A6G | S60 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2319 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 876 kg | 1537 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2720 mm |
