1950 Maserati A6GCS vs. 1990 Mazda 626
To start off, 1990 Mazda 626 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1950 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Maserati A6GCS | 1990 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | A6GCS | 626 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2520 mm |