1950 Maserati A6GCS vs. 1995 Volvo 960
To start off, 1995 Volvo 960 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 2,473 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Volvo 960 (168 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Volvo 960 weights approximately 876 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Maserati A6GCS | 1995 Volvo 960 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | A6GCS | 960 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2473 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 1500 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2780 mm |
