1950 Maserati A6GCS vs. 1996 Toyota Paseo
To start off, 1996 Toyota Paseo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati A6GCS (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Paseo. (89 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati A6GCS should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Paseo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Paseo weights approximately 296 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6GCS.
Because 1950 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Paseo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Maserati A6GCS | 1996 Toyota Paseo | |
| Make | Maserati | Toyota |
| Model | A6GCS | Paseo |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 920 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2390 mm |
