1950 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2000 Audi A6
To start off, 2000 Audi A6 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A6 weights approximately 1096 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 1950 Maserati A6GCS has manual transmission. 1950 Maserati A6GCS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Maserati A6GCS | 2000 Audi A6 | |
Make | Maserati | Audi |
Model | A6GCS | A6 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 1720 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2770 mm |