1950 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati A6GCS (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati A6GCS should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 721 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6GCS.
Because 1950 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Maserati A6GCS | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Maserati | Mazda |
| Model | A6GCS | 6 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2610 mm |
