1950 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 829 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Maserati A6GCS | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | A6GCS | C30 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 1453 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2639 mm |
