1950 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2012 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2012 Subaru Outback is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Subaru Outback (170 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Outback weights approximately 993 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Maserati A6GCS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Maserati A6GCS | 2012 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Maserati | Subaru |
| Model | A6GCS | Outback |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 1617 kg |
