1950 Mercury Roadster vs. 2012 Ford S-Max

To start off, 2012 Ford S-Max is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Mercury Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Mercury Roadster would be higher. At 3,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Mercury Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford S-Max (160 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1950 Mercury Roadster. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford S-Max should accelerate faster than 1950 Mercury Roadster.

Because 1950 Mercury Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Mercury Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford S-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1950 Mercury Roadster 2012 Ford S-Max
Make Mercury Ford
Model Roadster S-Max
Year Released 1950 2012
Body Type Convertible Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3990 cc 1600 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 160 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]