1950 Morris Oxford vs. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger (197 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1950 Morris Oxford. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1950 Morris Oxford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 138 kg more than 1950 Morris Oxford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Morris Oxford | 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Morris | Sunbeam |
| Model | Oxford | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 1476 cc | 4738 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1002 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 27 L |
