1950 Peugeot 203 vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1969 Riley Kestrel is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Peugeot 203 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Riley Kestrel (64 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1950 Peugeot 203. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1950 Peugeot 203. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Peugeot 203 weights approximately 14 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Because 1950 Peugeot 203 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Peugeot 203. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Riley Kestrel (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Peugeot 203. (80 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1969 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Peugeot 203.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Peugeot 203 | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Peugeot | Riley |
| Model | 203 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 924 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 25 L |
