1950 Peugeot 203 vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1950 Peugeot 203. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1950 Peugeot 203.
Because 1950 Peugeot 203 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Peugeot 203. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Peugeot 203 | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Peugeot | Ford |
| Model | 203 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2490 mm |
