1950 Riley RM A vs. 1992 Subaru Leone
To start off, 1992 Subaru Leone is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Subaru Leone is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Riley RM A weights approximately 205 kg more than 1992 Subaru Leone.
Because 1950 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Subaru Leone, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Riley RM A | 1992 Subaru Leone | |
| Make | Riley | Subaru |
| Model | RM A | Leone |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1992 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 72 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2470 mm |
