1950 Riley RM A vs. 2009 BMW 630
To start off, 2009 BMW 630 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 630 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 630 weights approximately 583 kg more than 1950 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 BMW 630 has automatic transmission and 1950 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1950 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 BMW 630 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Riley RM A | 2009 BMW 630 | |
Make | Riley | BMW |
Model | RM A | 630 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1818 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2790 mm |