1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2000 Volkswagen Lupo
To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom (164 HP) has 91 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 877 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom has automatic transmission and 2000 Volkswagen Lupo has manual transmission. 2000 Volkswagen Lupo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2000 Volkswagen Lupo | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Volkswagen |
Model | Phantom | Lupo |
Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5673 cc | 1422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 73 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.4:1 | 19.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 983 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5770 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2330 mm |