1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2003 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Korando is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom (164 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2003 SsangYong Korando. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 2003 SsangYong Korando.
Because 2003 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2003 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | SsangYong |
| Model | Phantom | Korando |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5673 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.4:1 | 22.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5770 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2490 mm |
