1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2006 Holden UTE
To start off, 2006 Holden UTE is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden UTE (204 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 360 kg more than 2006 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2006 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Holden |
| Model | Phantom | UTE |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5673 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 204 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5770 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2950 mm |
