1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche (310 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 599 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Chevrolet |
| Model | Phantom | Avalanche |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5673 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1261 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5770 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 3310 mm |
