1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2011 Kia Forte
To start off, 2011 Kia Forte is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Forte (173 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 570 kg more than 2011 Kia Forte.
Because 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2011 Kia Forte | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Kia |
Model | Phantom | Forte |
Year Released | 1950 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5673 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 173 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5770 mm | 4481 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1765 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2649 mm |