1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (321 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 98 kg more than 2013 Volvo S60.
Because 2013 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Volvo |
| Model | Phantom | S60 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5673 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 93 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1762 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5770 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2097 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2776 mm |
