1950 Saab 92 vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Saab 92 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1950 Saab 92. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1950 Saab 92.
Because 2006 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Saab 92. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Saab 92 | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Saab | Ford |
| Model | 92 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 764 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2490 mm |
