1950 Saab 92 vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Saab 92 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz C (228 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1950 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1950 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 890 kg more than 1950 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz C is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Saab 92. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz C will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Saab 92 | 2010 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Saab | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 92 | C |
Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 764 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2761 mm |