1950 Simca 8 vs. 1973 Triumph Toledo
To start off, 1973 Triumph Toledo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Triumph Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Triumph Toledo (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1950 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Triumph Toledo should accelerate faster than 1950 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Simca 8 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1973 Triumph Toledo.
Because 1950 Simca 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Simca 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Triumph Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Simca 8 | 1973 Triumph Toledo | |
| Make | Simca | Triumph |
| Model | 8 | Toledo |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1090 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2460 mm |
