1950 Simca 8 vs. 1999 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1999 Toyota Celica is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 1,792 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota Celica (145 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1950 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1950 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Toyota Celica weights approximately 170 kg more than 1950 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Simca 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Simca 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Simca 8 | 1999 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Simca | Toyota |
Model | 8 | Celica |
Year Released | 1950 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1090 cc | 1792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2510 mm |