1950 Simca 8 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 1,390 cc, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 136 kg more than 1950 Simca 8.
Because 1950 Simca 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Simca 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Simca 8 | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Simca | Volkswagen |
| Model | 8 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1090 cc | 1390 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1056 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2470 mm |
