1950 Simca 8 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1950 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1950 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 828 kg more than 1950 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Simca 8 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Simca | Cadillac |
| Model | 8 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1090 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2880 mm |
