1950 Simca 8 vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1950 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1950 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 871 kg more than 1950 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Simca 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Simca 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Simca 8 | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Simca | Volvo |
| Model | 8 | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1090 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1791 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4627 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1891 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1713 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2774 mm |
