1951 Abarth 205 vs. 2000 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Abarth 205. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Abarth 205 would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1951 Abarth 205. (64 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1951 Abarth 205. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 457 kg more than 1951 Abarth 205. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Abarth 205 | 2000 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 205 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1188 cc | 4940 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 818 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 132 L |
