1951 Abarth 205 vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Abarth 205. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Abarth 205 would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1951 Abarth 205. (64 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1951 Abarth 205.
Because 1951 Abarth 205 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Abarth 205. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Abarth 205 | 2009 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 205 | HHR |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1188 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 61 L |