1951 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1981 Renault 4
To start off, 1981 Renault 4 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1981 Renault 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 705 kg more than 1981 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1981 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
| Model | 6C | 4 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |
