1951 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1983 Lada Niva
To start off, 1983 Lada Niva is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1983 Lada Niva. (76 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1983 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 250 kg more than 1983 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1983 Lada Niva | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lada |
Model | 6C | Niva |
Year Released | 1951 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1452 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 71 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2210 mm |