1951 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1988 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1988 Mercury Sable is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1988 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercury |
Model | 6C | Sable |
Year Released | 1951 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |