1951 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 154 kg more than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
| Model | 6C | 300 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3518 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 253 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 81 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1554 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2960 mm |
