1951 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Kia |
Model | 6C | K2700 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2380 mm |